Joshua 9:18

Assamese - 2019 (ইণ্ডিয়ান ৰিভাইচ ভাৰচন (IRV) আচামিচ - 2019)

ইস্ৰায়েলৰ সন্তান সকলে তেওঁলোকক বধ নকৰিলে কাৰণ অধ্যক্ষসকলে ইস্ৰায়েলৰ ঈশ্বৰ যিহোৱাৰ নামেৰে তেওঁলোকৰ আগত শপত খাইছিল। ইস্ৰায়েলী লোকসকলে অধ্যক্ষসকলৰ অহিতে ওজৰ-আপত্তি কৰিবলৈ ধৰিলে।

What Does This Mean?

In Joshua 9:18, the Israelites did not attack the Gibeonites because the leaders had made a promise to them in the name of God. The Israelites were upset with their leaders for this decision.

Explained for Children

Imagine you and your friends promised not to play a prank on someone, even if you didn't like them. Now, your other friends are upset because they wanted to play that prank. That’s like what happened here, but with grown-ups and a big promise.

Historical Background

This verse is from the Book of Joshua, written around 1370–1270 BCE. It was likely compiled by Joshua or his followers, recounting the events after the Israelites entered the Promised Land. The audience was the Israelites, and the cultural setting was one of military conquest and settlement.

Living It Out Today

In today's context, this verse teaches us about the importance of keeping promises, even if they are inconvenient. For example, if you promise to help a friend move on a busy day, you should follow through.

Topics

• promise-keeping
• leadership
• conflict resolution
• trust
• obligation
• consequences

Related Verses

• Numbers 30:2
• Deuteronomy 23:21
• Ecclesiastes 5:4
• Matthew 5:33
• James 5:12

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the verse teach about promises?

It teaches that promises made in the name of God must be honored, even if it means facing opposition from others.

Why were the Israelites upset with their leaders?

They were upset because the leaders' promise prevented them from attacking the Gibeonites, which they wanted to do.

How does this verse relate to leadership?

It shows the importance of leaders making decisions based on promises and following through, even if it's unpopular.

What can we learn about conflict resolution from this verse?

It shows that sometimes, resolving conflicts requires honoring commitments, even when it means giving up on immediate advantages.